<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Carry on Sergeant?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fallen-angel.co.uk/2008/11/22/carry-on-sergeant/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fallen-angel.co.uk/2008/11/22/carry-on-sergeant/</link>
	<description>Rob's Homepage</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 11:03:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pandemonia</title>
		<link>http://www.fallen-angel.co.uk/2008/11/22/carry-on-sergeant/comment-page-1/#comment-660</link>
		<dc:creator>Pandemonia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 08:46:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theshitefantastic.net/fallen-angel/?p=188#comment-660</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is one of the fundamental problems with reality TV &#8211; it&#8217;s not about talent or skills, it&#8217;s about likeability &#8211; or the lack thereof.  The British public feel that they can influence anything they want for the most spurious of reasons.  </p>
<p>They vote for people because:<br />
<strong>A)</strong> They&#8217;re nice, but often not too nice.<br />
<strong>B) </strong>They?¢‚Ç¨‚Ñ¢re pretty, but not too pretty.<br />
<strong>C) </strong>They&#8217;re good at something unrelated. i.e. (I&#8217;ll vote for my favourite football player even though they&#8217;re plainly rubbish at ice skating in scuba gear.<br />
<strong>D) </strong>They&#8217;re not the judge?¢‚Ç¨‚Ñ¢s choice and the judges were a bit rude about them.<br />
<strong>E)</strong> They&#8217;re the underdog.</p>
<p>Now we like the underdog, it&#8217;s one of those things that exemplify the British psyche.  We think that it&#8217;s jolly unfair if they don&#8217;t have a chance.  This is a commendable feature up to a point, but coupled with our tendency to take our pleasures sadly and glory in failure, it does mean that we&#8217;re destined for Jordan to be our Prime Minister.  </p>
<p><strong>A)</strong> She?¢‚Ç¨‚Ñ¢s easy ?¢‚Ç¨‚Äú good to know if you?¢‚Ç¨‚Ñ¢re an outraged fad middle aged Daily Mail reader ?¢‚Ç¨‚Äú even you are in with a chance!<br />
<strong>B) </strong>She&#8217;s considered by some to have the criteria for being pretty (that?¢‚Ç¨‚Ñ¢s not the word, there needs to be one, maybe glamonster) ?¢‚Ç¨‚Äú but a bit tacky, both physically and conceptually.<br />
<strong>C) </strong>She?¢‚Ç¨‚Ñ¢s good at self publicising ?¢‚Ç¨‚Äú not just positive publicity but any.<br />
<strong>D)</strong> Everyone thinks she?¢‚Ç¨‚Ñ¢s quite dumb so therefore deserves a chance to prove she?¢‚Ç¨‚Ñ¢s not ?¢‚Ç¨‚Äú or at least until she does something really stupid.<br />
<strong>E)</strong> She?¢‚Ç¨‚Ñ¢s low down the social scale and she?¢‚Ç¨‚Ñ¢s a dog.</p>
<p>That coupled with the national disaster?¢‚Ç¨‚Ñ¢s that?¢‚Ç¨‚Ñ¢d occur if she was in charge ?¢‚Ç¨‚Äú well glory in her failure ?¢‚Ç¨‚Äú just what the country likes and there?¢‚Ç¨‚Ñ¢s never be a time when we didn?¢‚Ç¨‚Ñ¢t know what was going on!  She?¢‚Ç¨‚Ñ¢d be monitored 24 hours a day.</p>
<p>And the public absolve themselves from blame about the situation.  We chose her and she messed it up.  Of course she messed it up ?¢‚Ç¨‚Äú you chose her.</p>
<p>Remember politics no one voted for Margaret Thatcher, John Major, Tony Blair and Gordon Brown.  We voted for (or against) the parties that they represent.  And people, don?¢‚Ç¨‚Ñ¢t kick up a fuss because someone you don?¢‚Ç¨‚Ñ¢t like is in charge of the party.  You gave them the ability to be there ?¢‚Ç¨‚Äú and it could always be worse.  Jordan?¢‚Ç¨‚Ñ¢ll give anything a go.  Ask Gareth Gates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

